Author Archives: Chemco Group

The recycling system for polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in the United States is facing mounting pressure as imported recycled plastics increase and domestic demand weakens. Industry leaders have raised concerns that these market shifts are undermining the economic viability of local recycling infrastructure and threatening the long-term stability of the PET recycling system.

Rising Imports and Market Imbalance

Recycled PET imported from overseas now represents a significant share of the North American market, accounting for roughly a quarter of the material used. While imports may provide short term supply benefits, they are creating pricing pressure that makes it difficult for domestic recyclers to compete.

In recent years, at least five major PET recycling facilities in the United States have closed due to declining demand and the increasing availability of lower priced imported recycled resin. This shift is reducing local processing capacity and placing further strain on the country’s recycling ecosystem.

Importance of a Stable Recycling System

PET has historically been one of the most successfully recycled plastics, particularly in beverage bottles. Millions of tonnes of bottles are collected each year and converted back into packaging materials, textiles and other products. The system relies on a stable balance between collection, processing and end market demand to remain economically sustainable.

However, when recycled materials cannot find reliable buyers, recycling programmes become more expensive to operate and public confidence in recycling systems can decline. Industry stakeholders warn that maintaining strong domestic demand for recycled PET is essential to keep the system functioning effectively.

The Role of Industry Commitments

Industry experts emphasise that brands and manufacturers play a critical role in stabilising the recycling system. Long term supply agreements and commitments to use recycled content can create predictable demand for recycled materials, allowing recyclers to invest in infrastructure and expand processing capacity.

Sourcing recycled PET produced within North America has also been highlighted as a practical step to support local recycling markets and maintain economic viability for domestic recyclers.

Moving Towards a More Circular System

Strengthening the PET recycling system will require coordinated action across the entire value chain, including policymakers, recyclers, packaging producers and consumer brands. Measures such as recycled content targets, improved collection systems and stronger end market demand could help ensure that PET bottles and other packaging materials are effectively returned into the production cycle.

As global attention on circular economy solutions continues to grow, stabilising domestic recycling systems will remain a key priority. Ensuring that recycled plastics can compete in the marketplace is essential for sustaining recycling infrastructure and reducing reliance on virgin materials.

India’s National Green Tribunal is taking a closer look at the environmental impact of single use PET bottle caps, bringing attention to a packaging component that is often overlooked in wider sustainability discussions. While plastic bottles are already part of the recycling debate, caps present a separate challenge because they are small, detachable and far more likely to escape collection systems.

Why This Issue Matters

The case highlights a practical weakness in plastic waste management. Bottle caps are used in very large volumes across water, soft drinks and other packaged beverages, yet they are more likely than the bottle itself to be discarded improperly. Their size makes them harder to recover, easier to litter and less likely to move through recycling systems effectively.

That matters because packaging sustainability is no longer judged only by the main container. Regulators, manufacturers and recyclers are increasingly expected to account for how every part of a pack performs once it enters the waste stream. If one component is routinely lost, the overall system becomes less effective.

Design Is Becoming Part of the Compliance Discussion

The Tribunal’s review reflects a broader change in how packaging is being evaluated. The focus is moving beyond whether a bottle is technically recyclable and towards whether the full packaging format supports recovery in practice. That includes closures, which have often received less attention despite their role in litter and material loss.

This is where tethered caps have become more relevant. By keeping the cap attached to the bottle throughout use and disposal, they reduce the likelihood of separation before collection and improve the chances of both components being recovered together. The concept has already gained regulatory traction in other markets, particularly in Europe, where attached cap designs are now part of the packaging compliance framework for certain beverage containers.

What It Means for the Industry

For manufacturers, brand owners and converters, the message is clear. Closures are no longer just a functional packaging feature. They are becoming part of the wider sustainability and compliance equation. Businesses may need to assess whether their current packaging formats support collection, reduce litter risk and align with the direction of future regulation.

This also reinforces a larger point about circularity. Progress depends not only on material choice, but on whether packaging is designed to work within real collection and recycling systems. Small components can have an outsized impact when they are consistently lost from the stream.

Looking Ahead

The investigation into PET bottle caps signals a more detailed phase in the sustainability agenda. The conversation is moving from broad commitments to packaging performance in real world conditions. That is a necessary shift.

If regulatory attention continues to expand, the industry will need packaging solutions that deliver stronger recovery outcomes across the full lifecycle.

The global recycling landscape is entering a period of rapid transformation. Advances in technology, stronger regulatory frameworks, and changing market expectations are pushing the plastics industry to rethink how materials are recovered and reused. Analysts suggest that 2026 could become a defining year for recycling innovation and system efficiency.

Below are five developments expected to influence recycling systems and circular economy strategies in the coming year.

Artificial Intelligence Improving Sorting Efficiency

Artificial intelligence and advanced sensor technologies are increasingly being integrated into recycling facilities. Machine learning systems can identify materials more accurately and at higher speeds than traditional sorting methods. These technologies allow materials recovery facilities to detect different plastic types, colours, and formats with greater precision, which improves material quality and recovery rates.

As these systems become more widely adopted, they are expected to reduce contamination in recycling streams and improve the economic viability of recycling operations.

Smart Waste Systems in Urban Infrastructure

Cities are beginning to implement digital waste management systems that track collection patterns and optimise recycling logistics. Smart bins equipped with sensors can monitor waste levels and help municipalities plan more efficient collection routes.

These data-driven systems support better waste segregation and enable local authorities to manage recycling programmes more effectively. Over time, digital infrastructure could play a key role in improving recycling rates in densely populated urban areas.

Expansion of Deposit Return Systems

Deposit return schemes are expected to expand in more regions as governments seek proven ways to increase the collection of beverage containers. These programmes place a small refundable deposit on packaging, encouraging consumers to return used containers for recycling.

Countries that have implemented deposit return systems often achieve significantly higher recovery rates for PET bottles and aluminium cans. Wider adoption of these systems may become a central strategy for improving material recovery.

Packaging Design Focused on Recyclability

Packaging design is also evolving as brands respond to sustainability commitments and regulatory pressure. Manufacturers are increasingly simplifying packaging formats and reducing complex multi-layer structures that are difficult to recycle.

Designing packaging with end-of-life recovery in mind allows materials to move more efficiently through recycling systems and supports the development of a more circular packaging economy.

Greater Collaboration Across the Value Chain

One of the most important trends shaping recycling in 2026 is stronger collaboration across the plastics value chain. Policymakers, recyclers, packaging producers, and consumer brands are recognising that recycling challenges cannot be solved in isolation.

Joint initiatives focused on improving collection systems, investing in infrastructure, and expanding the use of recycled content are becoming central to industry progress.

Looking Ahead

The coming years will likely determine how effectively the global plastics industry can transition toward circular material systems. Technological innovation, supportive regulation, and coordinated industry action will all influence how recycling evolves.

If these trends continue to develop, 2026 could mark a significant step toward building recycling systems that are more efficient, scalable, and capable of keeping plastics in productive use for longer.

Australia’s recycling industry is at a critical juncture, with industry leaders warning that delayed reforms could jeopardise the country’s ability to recycle plastics effectively. The Australian Council of Recycling (ACOR) has expressed concerns that without urgent legislative action, Australia’s plastic recycling capacity may collapse, despite having the infrastructure in place to process recyclable materials.

The Scale of the Issue

Each year, Australia generates over 1.3 million tonnes of plastic packaging, much of it imported, with over a million tonnes ending up in landfills or as litter. Although significant strides have been made in recycling, the lack of strong demand for locally recycled plastics is placing pressure on domestic recycling operations. Without reform, some facilities may face closure, further increasing the nation’s reliance on imported plastics and exacerbating environmental issues.

Economic Impact of Proposed Reforms

A recent report by Rennie Advisory, commissioned by ACOR and the Australian Packaging Covenant Organisation (APCO), highlighted the benefits of reform. The report proposed a fee-based Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) scheme, which would require brand owners and producers to take responsibility for the disposal of plastics packaging. This initiative, while adding a modest cost of 0.1% to product prices, could reduce plastics waste by 370,000 tonnes annually and generate over A$2.5 billion in value over five years. It would also create approximately 20,000 new jobs and cut down CO2 emissions by 700,000 tonnes per year.

Current Challenges and the Path Forward

Australia’s National Packaging Laws, agreed in 2023, aim to address the low recycling rates and move towards a circular economy. However, the current situation reveals that most plastic packaging sold in Australia is made from imported fossil fuels, with only 8% containing recycled plastics. Without regulatory change, the use of domestic recycling facilities could fall drastically, resulting in closures and job losses.

For Australia to meet its sustainability targets, it is crucial to build long-term demand for locally recycled plastics. Proper reforms would not only support businesses investing in improved packaging but also provide the foundation for a circular economy that benefits the environment and creates local jobs.

As of 31 January 2026, Ethiopia has officially banned the production, sale, and use of single-use plastic bags, in line with the country’s ongoing commitment to environmental sustainability. This legislation, enacted under Ethiopia’s Solid Waste Management Law (Proclamation 1383/2025), aims to address the environmental impact of plastic waste while promoting cleaner, greener alternatives across the nation.

Strict Penalties for Non-Compliance

The newly enforced ban comes with severe penalties for those violating the law. Individuals caught using or carrying plastic bags face fines ranging from ETB 2,000 ($12.90) to ETB 5,000 ($32.25). In addition, manufacturers, importers, and distributors are subject to hefty fines of up to ETB 200,000 ($1,289.97) and potential prison sentences of up to five years. Institutions found in breach of the law may face fines up to three times those imposed on individuals.

A Step Toward Safer Plastic Practices

The ban is part of Ethiopia’s broader strategy to mitigate the environmental harm caused by plastic waste. It mandates the introduction of safer plastic product designs, reductions in manufacturing waste, and the creation of take-back and recycling systems. The extended producer responsibility framework requires plastic manufacturers to finance the collection and recycling of their products once they reach the end of their lifecycle.

A Regional Trend

Ethiopia’s move to eliminate single-use plastics aligns with similar actions taken by other African nations, including Rwanda, Kenya, Tunisia, and Nigeria. These countries are part of a growing wave of African nations working to tackle plastic pollution and its long-term environmental impact.

The legislation, while introducing strict measures, also allows for certain exemptions where plastic packaging cannot be easily replaced. However, this does not extend to plastic bags, which remain completely prohibited.

Ethiopia’s comprehensive approach is a significant step towards a more sustainable and eco-conscious future, setting a powerful example for other nations in the region and beyond.